Back to Resources

Empty Enforcement

Apr 29, 2020

Examining state oil and gas enforcement across the West

For decades, oil and gas development has spread across the American West, driving local economies through boom and bust cycles, fragmenting wildlife habitat, and harming communities with air and water pollution. States play a critical role in protecting public health and the environment by inspecting oil and gas facilities, identifying violations, and, when appropriate, issuing financial penalties. However, the structure and success of oil and gas enforcement programs varies widely from state to state. An examination of Western state oil and gas enforcement finds that while some states have successful programs worth emulating, many have room to improve in order to adequately protect the health and safety of local communities and hold companies accountable. Enforcing environmental and safety regulations is especially critical as the coronavirus pandemic intersects with market forces to send oil prices tumbling. With widespread operations and crashing oil prices, companies are looking to cut costs, and many face the prospect of bankruptcy. With low financial consequences for violations, many companies may see noncompliance as a cheaper option than correctly monitoring their operations or shutting down wells. It is critical that Western states prioritize improving their oil and gas enforcement programs to protect local communities and the environment, and make sure taxpayers aren’t left on the hook for cleanup costs. Read the Report This new analysis by the Center for Western Priorities finds that many Western state oil and gas enforcement programs are at times understaffed, leading to low inspection rates. Few states issue financial penalties that are adequate to ensure oil and gas companies are complying with regulations, with some states issuing no financial penalties at all. In total, Western state oil and gas enforcement programs only collected $5.5 million from 62 fines in 2018, with more than 95 percent of that value assessed in Colorado. Critically, state enforcement programs often lack transparency, leaving the public in the dark. While some states have improved in recent years, decades of studies have shown that most states face chronic problems when enforcing oil and gas regulations. Looking across states, Utah has historically had the worst enforcement, while Wyoming and New Mexico are in the process of improving programs. Colorado, Montana, and Nevada have some of the stronger oil and gas enforcement programs, although they have opportunities to improve.
Going forward, states should:
  • Adopt a goal of inspecting all active wells once a year.
  • Track and publish all inspections, violations, resolutions, and penalties to increase enforcement transparency.
  • Standardize financial penalties in written public policies. These should include the time allowed to come into compliance and violation follow-up procedures.
  • Ensure state oil and gas enforcement agencies have the authority to directly assess financial penalties.
  • Increase financial penalties and their issuance such that the cost of noncompliance is greater than that of compliance.
To accomplish the above goals, states should better fund oil and gas enforcement programs where necessary and fully utilize budgets where applicable. For decades the oil and gas industry has had an outsized presence in the Western United States. Not only has this region experienced the boom and bust economy that comes with the industry, but also the threats to human and environmental health. State oil and gas enforcement programs play a critical role in ensuring that balanced, responsible development takes place. However, deficiencies in state oil and gas enforcement programs are widespread across the West. It is up to governors, legislatures, and oil and gas regulators to fix these shortcomings, hold extraction companies accountable, and protect local communities, lands, waters, and wildlife.
Read the Report

Related Resources

Despite oil industry howling, companies are awash in public lands drilling permits

When the Biden administration enacted a temporary pause on new oil and gas leases on public lands, the oil industry said the sky was falling, predicting massive job losses and production cuts. In the meantime, drill rig counts increased, stock prices rose, and major oil companies flush with cash began taking steps for their shareholders to reap the benefits. Data from the Bureau of Land Management shows that, despite industry fear mongering, oil companies had nearly 10,000 approved, but unused public lands drilling permits as of 2021, an all-time high in recent memory.

Learn More

30×30 Fact vs. Fiction: Pulling back the curtain on misinformation

The Biden administration has established a goal to conserve 30% of the nation’s lands and waters by 2030 for the benefit of all Americans. This goal, known as “30×30,” has been recommended by scientists in order to prevent the collapse of the planet’s natural systems while supporting communities across the country. Although the 30×30 initiative has widespread support from elected leaders, scientists, and the public, a number of bad actors have worked to spread misinformation on the topic. It’s time to set the record straight. Let’s take a look at the established facts.

Learn More

The oil industry’s public lands stockpile

The Center for Western Priorities’ digital interactive report on the oil industry’s public lands stockpile examines the millions of acres of idle leases stockpiled by the oil and gas industry. The report maps out oil and gas leases and finds that the oil industry is currently sitting on 9.9 million acres of idle leases across ten Western states—47.4 percent of all leases in the region.

Learn More

The dismal legacy of Trump’s ‘Energy Dominance’ agenda

The Center for Western Priorities‘ report on The Dismal Legacy of Trump’s ‘Energy Dominance’ Agenda shows how the Trump administration magnified pre-existing problems in the oil and gas system. Led by former oil lobbyist Interior Secretary David Bernhardt, the Trump administration took full advantage of an outdated legal system that benefits companies over taxpayers. The report offers suggestions for comprensively reforming the leasing system.

Learn More

Inside Interior Secretary David Bernhardt’s Wildly Destructive Track Record

In office, Interior Secretary David Berhard raced to enact the policy priorities of the oil, gas, and mining industries at the expense of vulnerable communities across the country. Such blatant favoritism required bending laws and ethics rules, all of which led to Bernhardt’s dismal record in the courts. As Bernhardt takes years of anti-conservation baggage and blatant contempt for Indigenous communities back to the private sector, the next administration will face the tall task of undoing the damage. Here’s a look inside Bernhardt’s destructive track record.

Learn More

Analysis: Trump administration ignores overwhelming public opposition in delisting the gray wolf

In 2020, Interior Secretary David Bernhardt announced his department was formally removing the gray wolf from the endangered species list, opening the door for states to allow increased hunting and trapping. An analysis by the Center for Western Priorities found that the Trump administration ignored overwhelming public opposition in delisting the gray wolf.

Learn More

Tracking Trump administration oil and gas handouts during a global pandemic

After a decade of racking up immense debt and rarely turning a profit, oil and gas corporations were briefly hammered by the COVID-19 pandemic and a global oil glut. Now, oil prices have rebounded. However, the Interior Department is bending over backwards to continue bailing out the industry—lowering royalty rates and granting lease suspensions, sidestepping their responsibility to provide taxpayers a fair return for publicly-owned oil and gas.

Learn More

Trump administration faces overwhelming public opposition to weakening bedrock environmental law

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to identify and consider the environmental impacts of major projects, from highways to new mining and drilling. Unfortunately, the Trump administration attempted to dramatically weaken how NEPA is enforced by limiting public input and tipping the scales towards new development. An analysis by the Center for Western Priorities (CWP) shows the public is overwhelmingly opposed to the misguided attempt to weaken America’s bedrock environmental law.

Learn More