The Wilderness Society (TWS) released a new report, Tuesday, detailing the risks to western economies as Congress and the Administration continue to prioritize leasing our public lands over protecting them. In the report, Too Wild to Drill, TWS examines 12 areas—nine of which are in the Rocky Mountain West—at risk of oil and gas drilling, but where it does not belong. These are places with extraordinary natural beauty and cultural significance that create millions of dollars in revenue for local economies and jobs for westerners living nearby.
Unlike oil and gas drilling, parks, forests and other protected lands are sustainable economic drivers. Westerners living near these places don’t have to worry as much about the boom and bust cycles of the past, when communities would have to scramble after the oil and gas wells ran dry.
The new report lays out the economic reasons, alongside the cultural, ecological and aesthetic reasons, for the government to adopt an equal ground approach to land use. The landscapes, waterways and clean air that support a vibrant tourism and outdoor recreation industry, and attract high quality employees into the west must be given the same consideration as the oil and natural gas companies wanting to drill.
| Park | State | Economic Benefits |
| Arches National Park | Utah |
|
| Chaco Canyon | New Mexico |
|
| Desolation Canyon | Utah |
|
| Greater Dinosaur Region | Colorado |
|
| Otero Mesa | New Mexico |
|
| The Red Desert | Wyoming |
|
| Thompson Divide | Colorado |
|
| Wyoming Range | Wyoming |
|
| North Fork of Flathead River | Montana |
|
Counties with protected lands do better than counties without. The research group Headwaters Economics has found that, on average, the per capita income in rural western counties is $436 higher for every 10,000 acres of protected public lands within the county’s boundaries. The numbers tell the tale, western economies rely on protected lands as sustainable economic drivers. The ball’s in Washington DC’s court.