Center for Western Priorities Facebook
Center for Western Priorities Twitter
Center for Western Priorities Videos

GET EMAIL UPDATES

New Data Confirms: Decade High Oil Production on Federal Lands

Oil and gas companies are producing more crude oil from federal lands than at any point in the last decade. Add this new round of government data to the mountain of evidence: Oil and gas drillers have their eye—and their investment dollars—set on areas with valuable crude oil, as natural gas prices remain stagnant.

 

According to a Greenwire analysis of 2013 production numbers released by the Interior Department:

 Industry coaxed 133 million barrels of crude from onshore federal lands during the last fiscal year, a 7 percent jump over the previous year and the highest level in more than a decade. Production soared 48 percent on American Indian lands, rising to 46 million barrels in 2013, much of it from the Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota’s Bakken region…

 

When it comes to oil and gas, not all areas are created equal. Some parts of the country don’t have any oil or gas, some are underlain primarily by crude oil and others by natural gas. Companies make investment decisions based off of market forces—the price oil and gas fetches—and where the oil and gas lies. If it’s not profitable to drill for natural gas, a company will set its sights on more profitable oil reserves.

 

That’s precisely what we’ve seen in western Colorado, which has significant natural gas, but limited crude oil. There, companies like Encana, Bill Barrett Corp, Antero Resources, and PDC Energy are halting drilling and shifting capacity to areas with more crude oil, like eastern Colorado.

 

By a coincidence of geography, the large majority of federal lands—like in western Colorado—are underlain by natural gas, not oil. But, as the new data proves, where oil does exist on federally managed lands— for example, in North Dakota—oil production is booming.

 

So next time you hear a politician, or an industry lobbyist, say that drilling is down on public lands because of federal bureaucracy, remember, it’s an expedient talking point, but not one that’s grounded in reality.

Latest News

@WstrnPriorities on Twitter


2 days ago
In this episode of Go West, Young Podcast (subscribe on iTunes or Google Play), we look at the environmental cost if President Trump’s dream of a “great wall” along the U.S-Mexico border becomes a reality. https://t.co/JVFkiILmli https://t.co/ElgBe4AfDj WstrnPriorities photo
3 days ago
Automatic sequestration cuts triggered by the tax bill would eliminate all mineral leasing payments to states. https://t.co/bPYUrU4JFb
3 days ago
Secretary Zinke’s wife played a key role in his official event and travel planning, "caused headaches for Interior staff," records show
https://t.co/5kizkbrM3x https://t.co/WoutkATncq
WstrnPriorities photo
3 days ago
New via @amprog: Tax bills would eliminate all oil, gas, and coal payments to Western states and Alaska. States could lose $1.3 billion a year. https://t.co/7DBMJHEPdU https://t.co/lChvjjI9JR WstrnPriorities photo

FROM THE BLOG


House committee chairman attacks reporter for doing his job

Utah Congressman Rob Bishop, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, has made no secrets about his disdain for America’s...

November 10th, 2017

Trying to shrink Bears Ears, Trump makes it clear whose heritage he cares about

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said Friday that President Trump had called him to announce his intent to dramatically shrink Bears...

October 27th, 2017

The Zinke Doctrine: Make public lands hard for the public to use, easy for industry to abuse

More than six months into Secretary Ryan Zinke’s tenure at the Interior Department, we’re getting a clear picture of what...

October 27th, 2017